Change is a complex phenomenon. There are different types of changes that are going on around us. Listed in this article are twelve areas in which change arises and bring some classification to it. However one may classify the change, the various heading is always interrelated. The change could be triggered by market changes, technological changes, or organizational changes.
There are several models of organizational change. A model is an integrated way of explaining why and how change takes place, based on a known and acceptable basic explanation (theory) of relationships of several aspects involved. It would be obvious that there can be different ways of explaining the change, depending on what theory we follow or use.
Two contrasting models of change are the "trickle-down" model vs. "identity search" model. In the trickle-down models of change, the change is driven by the elite group. The organizational change occurs because the top management takes a decision and adopts some new ways (technology, systems, structure, etc.) and others follow it.
According to the Identify Search Model, the urge to develop one's own uniqueness and identity will make the group or individuals accept change.
Another way is to look at change is to look for the external or internal forces as determinants of changes. Change can be a result of internal factors like changes in the direction and objectives and ideology of a company or a workforce.
The changes, which occur within the business, can result from external environments such as the development of technology, globalization of markets, or new competitors on the market.
Business models change as managers engage in more mundane adaptation in response to external changes. The adaptation model emphasizes the role of external factors (for example a new government policy, or competitive environment) in producing a change in organizations (more emphasis on quality, restructuring, etc.). To respond positively to environmental changes, the person must adapt.
According to the proactive model, the explanation comes from within the organization (the decision of the organization to set an example, to be a leader, to anticipate the future) and act and change itself in response to such an internal urge. Companies that take a proactive approach to change are often trying to avoid a potential future threat or to capitalize on a potential future opportunity. Corrective action was being taken before a market decline or before technology became obsolete. Positive action was being taken to seize competitive advantage before someone else did.
Yet another explanation of organizational change may lie in the emphasis on the structure or the process. Structural change refers to a dramatic shift in the way a country, industry, or market operates. Successful change, according to the structure model, would require preparing the necessary structural details (technology, design of the organization, systems), and introduce them systematically.
The process of change entails creating the perception that a change is needed, then moving toward the new, desired level of behavior and, finally, solidifying that new behavior as the norm. People will also change, according to the process model, successful change can be planned by helping people to develop process competencies (ways of planning, decision-making, problem-solving, collaborating, communicating, etc.), and then people will find new ways of organizing, etc.
Adaptive change requires new learning for problem definition and solution implementation. Adaptive change requires auditing of existing systems, roles, and responsibilities. This process can often result in essentially rebuilding the entire company by redefining job descriptions, consolidation, elimination of overlap, and creating greater efficiencies. This involves the reimplementation of a change in the same organizational unit. Adaptive change is not considered threatening.
An organization needs to constantly innovate to succeed. Innovation is about making things better, faster, or cheaper. Dynamically continuous innovation affects the way in which the company adapts to changing market conditions. This involves changes that are generally new and unfamiliar. The innovative changes create a kind of uncertainty and fear in organizations.
Radical innovation is an invention that destroys or supplants an existing business model. Radical innovation is the long-term growth strategy for revolutionary business transformation. The concept of radical innovation is about leveraging core competencies for the future and this is the most intimidating type of change. This type of change is most resisted in organizations. Radical innovation creates such a dramatic change in processes, products, or services that they transform existing markets or industries, or create new ones. Implementation of a radical change in an organization requires a long-term strategy.
This is a change brought about by a sudden or unplanned event. Whereas the planned change is a systematic, deliberate change in the way part or all of an organization functions. In planned change the focus is on processes, people, or technology; and one person, a project team, a department, or the entire firm can be involved in the change process.
Teams are part of the modern organizational culture. Whether you are a team leader or a team member, having a better understanding of how teams work, and being able to identify where the team is in the process, is a critical part of ensuring the team is ultimately successful. Start with the basics and understand what a team is and what role they play in an organization.
As we know change is inevitable as market expectations are not static, new technology is constantly being developed, and organizational responses are inevitable to these sequences. It is a simple matter of business evolution. If every manager and every employee could have some understanding of the triggers of change and their relationships with each other, then the acceptance to change would be easier.
At times like this, more than ever, it is essential that the organizations appreciate the human resource management skills required to successfully handle the transformation of industry and create an innovation culture. Read more to understand, how as a manager you can help in cultivating a culture of continuous innovation and adaptation to change.
Change & Culture of Innovation
Predicting the future is a tricky business but managers need to have a future perspective in order to take business advantage and remain competitive. They need to drive and introduce constructive change to the business of the enterprise. The first step to creativity and innovation is to drive a culture of Innovation. Managers need to focus on developing future mindset all the time to keep pace with the unfolding future.
A good leadership style is something that every effective leader must have in order to succeed, but identifying what that entails or does not entails might be difficult to understand. Most of the research on leadership focuses on the exemplary, best practices, and positive attributes of effective and successful leaders. This article talks about a new approach to learn leadership using lessons from bad leadership. That is the lessons to be learned by examining leaders who have not effectively exercised their power, authority, or influence.
A manager or an employee in an organization who is experiencing a high level of stress may develop high blood pressure, ulcers, irritability, difficulty in making routine decisions, loss of appetite, accident proneness, and the like. These can be subsumed under three general categories, physiological, psychological, and behavioral symptoms. Stress can give rise to a number of changes.
We define Lean as the systematic elimination of waste through a continual effort to decrease inefficiency; the lean leader strives to create a more efficient organization. Lean leadership is a philosophy. It is a consistent way of thinking and being in your role as a leader. The focus of this approach is on raising new leaders and help their team embrace a culture of continuous improvement. Learn what we mean by lean leadership style and its principles.
Stress is an essential part of our life. No one can live without stress. Stress can be beneficial as well as harmful. Stress as a positive influence adds excitement and hope while as a negative influence it can result in destructive feelings, anger, and depression. Although the general orientation to stress is to consider unfavorable outcomes, yet one must have observed that stress experiences may also facilitate the development of effective and varied coping behavior, increased personal resources, and lead to a sense of competence in development. Stress at a moderate level is not only inevitable but may be useful for physical and mental well-being.
Benefits of Teams in Workplace
The use of formal work teams is commonplace in modern organizations. But why we have teams? What are the benefits or advantages that teams provide for organizations and employees? Do we really need to adopt formal team structures and use team-building approaches in organizations? Read this article to explore and learn the benefits of having formal teams in organizations.
Recognizing Stress & its Sources
As an individual, you almost certainly know what stress feels like. Stressors are events or situations to which people must adjust. Stressors may be physical or psychological in nature. The level of severity of stress is determined not merely by exposure but the intensity, duration, and frequency of stressors. The sources of stress are many. They arise from multiple areas both with the individual and from the environment.
© 2023 TechnoFunc, All Rights Reserved