As we know change is inevitable as market expectations are not static, new technology is constantly being developed, and organizational responses are inevitable to these sequences. It is a simple matter of business evolution. If every manager and every employee could have some understanding of the triggers of change and their relationships with each other, then the acceptance to change would be easier.
When change is being implemented the natural tendency is to feel threatened by what is happening, if you don't think rationally and emotions and feelings take over. Sometimes, it is all seen as some kind of conspiracy by employers and they perceive that the management is concerned only to look after them. There could be elements of truth in this, but a major educational effort to get everyone in the company to expect change, and indeed to create it within their own spheres, would lead to the path of positive change.
Change is expressed through three main areas: the market itself, the technology to meet market demand competitively, the organization of resources, and the enterprise to achieve success. We also consider the tendency of companies to follow a pattern of similar life cycles. The stage in the life cycle could affect the nature of the changes which might be expected. In this article, we are looking at key triggers that necessitate the change.
The market is constantly evolving and the only way to survive in the market is to adapt to what market demands. Some examples of market-driven changes are:
All these create specific changes in your business, whatever it is. The changes in the marketplace will impact your company and if the impact is negative, there will be urgency in the organization to search for new products or for the creation of new expectations from old ones. There will be the decision to explore areas of the globe where you are not previously represented; by expanding your customer base by moving to the right place in order to hold in the demand for the moment.
Technology is naturally enough a significant part of the changing scenario. There are constant development and introduction of new technology that brings process optimization and results in reducing the people costs, or to speed up manufacturing and assembly processes or result in innovative ways of fulfilling a particular need. Technology enables meetings of customer needs, anywhere, at any time, in the form it is wanted and with the minimum of physical material and the maximum of accompanying service. Technological change has a knock-on effect so that change in this field in response to need becomes the trigger of further change. Technology can force an organization to re-establish price advantage, quality pre-eminence, or diversification into new products.
These changes in the market or technology will also affect the organization. If on the negative side it could result in retrenchment, a reduction in the number of employees, and a reduction in the number of levels of management. The technology itself might require new styles of organization, new sills, and the upgrading of old ones. The number of operating sites may be reduced. People may find themselves performing totally new functions, which they may like or perhaps won't like, at least to start with. The only way to stay in business may be a merger or to be the subject of a takeover, friendly or hostile. With such ownership changes, another market, technological and organizational changes may follow. In some industries, it is an endless cycle.
Most CEOs seeking to improve results do something about the organizational structure and culture of their enterprise. The organization is a matter of structuring the way in which resources are brought and kept together in order to achieve objectives. These resources include people, places, money, materials, and machines. Most changes have some implications for the ways in which resources and relationships are organized. Whether corrective action is being taken or opportunities are being seized, the organization's change will make a difference to the immediacy of reaching and speed of decision-making, information-sharing, communications, and policy implementation.
The culture change brought about by reorganizing is the most difficult handle and the ones that take the longest. They have to overcome the inhibitions of whole corporate life history, and they are likely to meet emotional resistance.
The restructuring of organizations will have to be essentially rational and it will move in different directions, depending on need.
At times like this, more than ever, it is essential that the organizations appreciate the human resource management skills required to successfully handle the transformation of industry and create an innovation culture. Read more to understand, how as a manager you can help in cultivating a culture of continuous innovation and adaptation to change.
In our present Hitech scenario, society is changing very fast. What are the skills that are most relevant for leaders in relation to the changing economic environment? Leaders need to develop skills to drive innovation and change in order to play a more central role in their organizations’ activities. How do managers accept the change and meet business expectations by becoming a key figure in driving change and innovation?
Reasons behind Wastage of Time
Under-utilization of time may be due to the faulty system or faults of manager/officer/leader or due to lack of planning. There could be many factors driving the procrastination behavior like system issues, personal work habits, and lack of delegation, personality traits, and bad working habits of the leader, failure to tackle interpersonal conflicts, obstacles, and lack of far-sightedness.
Understanding of how individuals of different cultures interact with each other is very important. Not all individuals can adapt to the leadership styles expected in a different culture whether that culture is organizational or national. In a fast-paced business environment, developing a richer understanding and sensitivity to other cultures is a skill that leaders must possess. Learn to be effective in a cross-cultural setting.
Collaborative leadership is all about collaborative problem-solving and decision-making or can also be defined as the leadership of a collaborative effort. . The term started to appear in the mid-1990s in response to the formation of long term public-private partnerships to rebuild public infrastructure. Learn how you can use principles of collaborative leadership to enhance your leadership skills for being an effective leader.
David Kolb produced this popular model for learning in 1984. The model suggests four stages of learning which most learners go through in order to learn effectively. Leaming is itself a process of change. Something is added to our perception and prepared us for the next impression, which will change our understanding yet more, however minutely. The Kolb contribution is a significant one because it practically equates change and learning.
Concept & Definition of Stress
Stress is a popular expression used by people in day to day life. Pressures of day to day living sometimes necessitate coping or dealing with them and stretch the body beyond its natural capacity. They are called stressors. Stress is a natural, ongoing dynamic, and interactive process that takes place as people adjust to their environment.
A manager or an employee in an organization who is experiencing a high level of stress may develop high blood pressure, ulcers, irritability, difficulty in making routine decisions, loss of appetite, accident proneness, and the like. These can be subsumed under three general categories, physiological, psychological, and behavioral symptoms. Stress can give rise to a number of changes.
A good leadership style is something that every effective leader must have in order to succeed, but identifying what that entails or does not entails might be difficult to understand. Most of the research on leadership focuses on the exemplary, best practices, and positive attributes of effective and successful leaders. This article talks about a new approach to learn leadership using lessons from bad leadership. That is the lessons to be learned by examining leaders who have not effectively exercised their power, authority, or influence.
Generating Ideas using Brainstorming
The brainstorming technique was developed by Alex F. Osborn in 1957 and brainstorming means where a team of members generates a large amount of alternative fruitful ideas on a specific problem without any criticism and then evaluates each idea in terms of their pros and cons. Brainstorming techniques fall into four broad categories: visioning, exploring, modifying, and experimenting.
© 2023 TechnoFunc, All Rights Reserved