Role Theory of Leadership
Role theory is a concept in sociology and the role theory of leadership borrows these concepts to explain how people adapt to specific organizational and leadership roles. How the leaders and followers in an organizational context define their own roles, define the roles of others, how people act in their roles and how people expect people to act in their roles within the organization.
What is Role Theory?
Role Theory is a perspective in sociology and social psychology. Role Theory proposed that human behavior is guided by expectations held both by the individual and by other people. The expectations correspond to different roles individuals perform or enact in their daily lives, such as secretary, father, or friend. The model is based on the observation that people behave in a predictable way, and that an individual’s behavior is context specific, based on social position and other factors. Each social role is a set of rights, duties, expectations, norms and behaviors that a person has to face and fulfill. Roles are occupied by individuals, who are called "actors".
Role Theory of Leadership:
Role theory as it relates to organizational leadership is how the leaders and followers in an organizational context define their own roles, define the roles of others, how people act in their roles and how people expect people to act in their roles within the organization. The basic assumptions is that the leaders often define their own roles within an organization based on the how the employees see the leader’s role. This theory is based on the assumptions from social role theory that people define roles for themselves and others based on social learning and reading and they form expectations about the roles that they and others will play. People also encourage others within their social circle to act within the role expectations they have for them and they themselves try to act within the roles they adopt.
How it Works?
Associated with every work environment is a set of activities or roles that are defined as potential behaviors to be performed in accordance with a specific job. Within organizations, there exist both formal and informal channels to convey these expectations about leader's role. Formal role theory reveals itself through policies and positions set by upper management. Examples of formal channels are leadership values training, explicit leadership behaviors at different levels/bands, organizational culture, training sessions, mentoring by senior managers, and so on.
Informal role theory reveals itself through the expectations of followers. Employees have internal representations about the role of leaders, based on what they read, discuss, hear, observe and so on. They consciously or unconsciously send these expectations to their leaders, acting as role senders, for example forwarding an important customer escalation mail to the manager for decision and guidance in-spite of employee knowing the desired actions to resolve the same. This balancing of decisions employees take upon ourselves and the ones that they leave on their leaders pass these subtle expectations to the leader. Leaders get influenced by these signals, and will generally adapt and follow these, playing the leadership role that is put upon them by their followers.
Role Theory Terms:
Role expectations of a leader can vary from very specific to a broad idea within which the leader can define their own style. Given below are definitions of some common terms used in context of Role Theory of Leadership.
Role Set refers to any feature of the organization that is able to send role expectations/requirements and role pressures to the manager.
Role expectations refer to the degree to which all members of the manager's role set develop beliefs and attitudes about what the manager should and should not do as part of his/her role.
Sent role refers to the fact that role expectations are sent to the focal person (e.g., manager).
Role pressures refer to the numerous influence attempts directed at the focal person that make up the process of role sending.
Role forces are regarded as psychological forces of some magnitude and direction that result from sent pressures by role senders and are the immediate source of the manager's motivation to behave.
Role behavior is a system relevant behavior that is performed by one who is an accepted member of the system, and whose behavior is reinforced by the formalities of the organization.
Role Conflicts: According to role theory, role conflict is a possible experience for leaders within a business or organization. When the employees in a business have a set of expectations on the role of the leaders that are different from what the leaders accept as their role, role conflict can occur. Role conflict can also occur when different people have differing expectations of their leaders. It also happens when leaders have different ideas about what they should be doing compared to the expectations of followers or management. Similarly role conflict can also occur when a leader feels they should be performing a certain role but employees expect the leader to fill a different role.
Related Links
You May Also Like
-
University of Iowa Studies was the first leadership study to analyze leadership using scientific methodology. The study was conducted by Lewin, Lippitt, and White and worked on different styles of leadership. The studies explored three leadership styles - authoritarian, democratic, and laissez-fair leaders. This early study was very influential and established three major leadership styles.
-
Bass's Transformational Leadership Theory
Bass Transformational Leadership Theory is based on performance beyond expectations approach which defines four elements of transformational leadership. The 4 elements described by Bernard A. Bass in 1985 are Idealised Influence, Intellectual Stimulation, Individualised Consideration, and Inspirational Motivation. This study highlights four key insights about performance beyond expectations and associated criteria to measure it.
-
Have you ever resonated that there seem to be as many different ways to lead people as there have been great leaders? When we recall the success of Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, Abraham Lincoln, Napoleon Bonaparte to Steve Jobs and Jack Welch, we also notice that they all used different approaches that were suitable to their specific situations and circumstances. Over the last century, researchers and psychologists have developed simple ways to describe the “Styles of leadership” and in this section, we will explore these commonly known leadership styles.
-
The Valence Model of Leadership
The valence model of emergent leadership is based on a group-development sequence. As per the valence model, the process of emergent leadership passes through three distinct stages; Orientation, Conflict, and Emergence. Group members willingly start following and obeying the leader who has passed the "emergence threshold."
-
The cognitive resource theory states the influence of the leader's resources on his or her reaction to stress. The cognitive resources of a leader are experience, intelligence, competence, and task-relevant knowledge. Stress is common in resource managing situations, and this cognitive theory emphasizes how intelligence and experience are each best under different stress situations. This theory is the reconceptualization of the Fiedler model.
-
Contingency Theories of Leadership
Contingency theories of leadership focus on both the leader's persona as well as the situation/environment in which that leader operates. These theories consider the context of leadership which means whether or not the leadership style suits a particular situation and states that a leader can be effective in one circumstance and a failure in another one. A leader will be most effective when he applies the right leadership style to a given situation and environment around him. Contingent leaders are flexible and adaptable.
-
McGregor's Theory X and Theory Y
McGregor created Theory X and Theory Y of human work motivation and explained two styles of management known as authoritarian (Theory X) and participative (Theory Y). Theory X management assumes most people will attempt to avoid work whereas Theory Y managers trust their people to take ownership of their work.
-
The Systemic Approach to Leadership
The systemic approach to leadership looks at the organization as a whole and focuses on the understanding of the organization as a system. Moving to systems thinking demand managers to view organizations as organic systems. Leaders are also part of this complex system which is constantly undergoing change and evolving. The leaders need to manage the relations and networks within these systems by acting with systemic awareness.
-
Leader-Participation Model provides a set of rules to determine the form and amount of participative decision making. It helps identifies different ways a decision can be made based on the degree of follower participation. It proposes a method for leaders to involve all members of the organization work together to make decisions.
-
Certain generally accepted truths or principles of communication are important to consider when communicating with others. These principles hold true for all people in every culture. By understanding these principles, you will experience greater communication effectiveness. An effective communication system is one that achieved its objectives. Communication is effective where there are no barriers to communication.
