Contingency Theories of Leadership
Contingency theories of leadership focus on both the leader's persona as well as the situation/environment in which that leader operates. These theories consider the context of leadership which means whether or not the leadership style suits a particular situation and states that a leader can be effective in one circumstance and a failure in another one. A leader will be most effective when he applies the right leadership style to a given situation and environment around him. Contingent leaders are flexible and adaptable.
What is your natural leadership style and do you have the flexibility to change your style based on situations or environments? In this article, we will explore Fiedler's Contingency Model, and focus on particular variables related to the environment that might determine which particular style of leadership is best suited for the given situation.
Contingency Theories & Behavioral Theories
Contingency theories are a class of behavioral theory that contends that there is no one best way of leading and that a leadership style that is effective in some situations may not be successful in others.
Contingency theories are a class of behavioral theory that claims that there is no best way to organize a corporation, to lead a company, or to make decisions. Instead, the optimal course of action is contingent (dependent) upon the internal and external situation. An effect of this is that leaders who are very effective at one place and time may become unsuccessful either when transplanted to another situation or when the factors around them change.
The contingency and path-goal approaches are an extension of behavior approaches in the sense they also stress on motivational aspects of the leader and followers. However, they equally stress the interactional aspects of leadership particularly the interaction of individual and organizational factors.
Previous theories such as Weber's bureaucracy and Taylor's scientific management had failed because they neglected that management style and organizational structure were influenced by various aspects of the environment: the contingency factors. There could not be "one best way" for leadership or organization.
Situational & Contingency Theories
Contingency theories of leadership attempt to solve this shortcoming of earlier theories by focusing on particular variables related to the environment that might determine which particular style of leadership is best suited for the situation. According to contingency theory, a leader’s success depends upon a number of variables, including the leadership style, qualities of the followers, and aspects of the situation.
Further, situational and contingency theories overlap to a great extent. Because of their closely related philosophy, the situational theory and contingency theory are often mentioned together.
The contingency model of leadership suggests that individual and organizational factors must be correctly matched for effective leadership and the group effectiveness is contingent upon the match between leadership style and the extent to which the group situation is favorable to the leader's effectiveness depends on the interaction of the leader's behavior with certain organizational factors.
This helps to explain how some leaders who seem for a while to have the 'Midas touch' suddenly appear to go off the boil and make very unsuccessful decisions. Thus, we can say that the basic assumption of this theory is that the leader's ability to lead is contingent upon various situational factors, including the leader's preferred style, the capabilities and behaviors of followers, and also various other situational factors.
Contingency Theories of Leadership
In the contingency theory of leadership, the success of the leader is a function of various contingencies in the form of subordinate, task, and/or group variables. The effectiveness of a given pattern of leader behavior is contingent upon the demands imposed by the situation.
To understand this theory we should examine the individual leader, the organizational factors (or leadership situation), and the interaction of these factors. As per this model, leader effectiveness is based on two factors, "the leadership style" and "the situational favorableness" (also known as "situational control"). In short, the contingency theory is concerned with styles and situations.
Situational Control
Sometimes the success of a leader does not depend upon the qualities, traits, and behavior of a leader alone. The context in which a leader exhibits her/his skills, traits, and behavior matters, because the same style of functioning may not be suitable for different situations. Thus the effectiveness of leadership also depends upon situations.
Situational Variables
Several research studies, when analyzing the reason for inconsistent results in differing conditions with the same leadership style, laid their focus on situational variables.
The contingency theory allows for predicting the characteristics of the appropriate situations for effectiveness. According to Fiedler, the ability to control the group situation (the second component of the contingency model) is crucial for a leader. This is because only leaders with situational control can be confident that their orders and suggestions will be carried out by their followers.
This theory views leadership in terms of a dynamic interaction between a number of situational variables like the leader, the followers, the task situation, the environment, etc.
Fiedler broke this factor down into three major components: leader-member relations, task structure, and position power. Both low-LPC (task-oriented) and high-LPC (relationship-oriented) leaders can be effective if their leadership orientation fits the situation.
Leadership Styles based on Contingency Model:
Jack Welch has once commented “It goes without saying that you cannot pigeonhole. Good people are too multifaceted. That said, I would still make the case that due to their skills and personalities, some people work more effectively in commodities and others are better in highly differentiated products or services... The right people for [a commodity] business are hard-driving, meticulous, and detail-oriented. They are not dreamers; they’re hand-to-hand combat fighters. . . . At the other end of the spectrum, it’s generally a different kind of person who thrives, not better or worse, just different”.
According to contingency theory also, leadership styles can be described as task-oriented or relationship-oriented. Task-oriented leaders are concerned primarily with reaching a goal or completing a task whereas relationship-oriented leaders are concerned with developing close interpersonal relationships with their followers.
List of Contingency Theories
Several contingency approaches were developed concurrently in the late 1960s, however; the most widely recognized is Fiedler’s (1964, 1967; Fiedler & Garcia, 1987). Contingency theory is a leader–match theory which tries to match leaders to appropriate situations. It is called contingency because it suggests that a leader’s effectiveness depends on how well the leader’s style fits the context or the situation.
Some of the noteworthy studies on situational contexts that gained wide recognition include
- Fiedler Model of Leadership
- Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational theory
- Leader-Member Exchange theory
- Path-Goal Leadership Theory
- Leader-Participation model
- Cognitive Resource Theory
- Life cycle theory of Leadership
- Multiple Linkage Model
- Normative Leadership Theory
- Participative Leadership Theories
- Situational Leadership Model
- Strategic Contingencies
- Vroom's Expectancy Theory
Related Links
You May Also Like
-
Attribution Theory of Leadership
The attribution theory of leadership deals with the formation of individual opinions about the reasons for particular events or observations. People will always try to understand why people do what they do. The leader will make a judgment about his employees based on his attribution of the causes of the employees' performance. Individuals will also make inferences about the leader and react to poor performance by the leader.
-
There are four characteristics of leadership that help us to understand the character of leadership as a concept. 1. Leadership is a process, 2. Leadership involves influence, 3. Leadership always occurs in a group context and 4. Leadership involves goal attainment. These are the four components that make up the character of the 'leadership' term and help us to define the leadership concept. All of these components of leadership have common characteristics.
-
Action Centered Leadership is a model developed by John Adair and focuses on the three responsibilities of a leader which are achieving the task, managing the team, and managing individuals. All these action elements are mutually dependent and important for any leader.
-
The two-factor theory also known as Herzberg's motivation-hygiene theory and dual-factor theory. This motivator-hygiene theory states that certain factors cause job satisfaction whereas certain separate factors cause dissatisfaction in the workplace. An organization can adjust these factors to influence motivation. These factors are respectively termed as motivators and hygiene factors.
-
Contingency Theories in Action
Contingency theory suggests matching the best leader to a specific situation based on situational factors and the leadership style. The practical application of theory can be done in various ways. The workplace example is to determine the best candidate for a given set of requirements using the LPC score. Applying the model to determine a leader's ability to adapt in the scenario of a new project etc..
-
The ten most important qualities that define a good leader are self-awareness, interpersonal and communication skills, ethical values, organizational consciousness, self-confidence, adaptability and flexibility, imagination and creativity, focus & result-orientation, continuous self-development and accountability and ownership for his actions. These ten qualities of leadership every good leader should possess to a certain extent and must continually strive to develop them.
-
All the teams are dynamic in nature and they take time to come together, they form, develop, and grow in stages, over a period of time. Teams go through five progressive stages: Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing and Adjourning. In this article, we want to introduce you to these stages of team development and certain strategies that you can use to help the team grow and develop in each of these stages.
-
Symbolic Interaction and Social Change
George Herbert Mead, an American philosopher, affiliated with the University of Chicago founded the theory of symbolic interactionism. A major aspect of this is that people interact by symbols both verbal and non-verbal signals and every interaction makes a contribution to the mental make-up of the mind thus every interaction with someone, changes you and you go away a different person signifying that humans and change go together.
-
In the field of communication studies, there are numerous models. No one model is suitable for all purposes and all levels of analysis. Some common models are known as Lasswell Model, George Gerbner Model, David Berlo Model, Shanon and Weaver Model, Osgoods Model, and Schramm Model. All these describe the four components of the communication process, namely, the source (communicator), the message, the channel, the receiver (audience).
-
The social identity theory of leadership views leadership as a group process. Social identity is a person's sense of who they are based on their group membership. Social identity theory sets agendas and goals generated by social categorization, defines who we are based on processes associated with social identity, and motivates to conduct ourselves based on what followers think of the leader.
