Cognitive Resource Theory
The cognitive resource theory states the influence of the leader's resources on his or her reaction to stress. The cognitive resources of a leader are experience, intelligence, competence, and task-relevant knowledge. Stress is common in resource managing situations, and this cognitive theory emphasizes how intelligence and experience are each best under different stress situations. This theory is the reconceptualization of the Fiedler model.
In the early 1990s, the original model of Fiedler was re-conceptualized by Fiedler and his associate Joe Garcia, as Cognitive Resource Theory. In this model, the focus has been laid on the role of stress as a form of situational un-favorableness and how a leader’s intelligence and experience influence her/his reaction to stress.
What is meant by cognition?
Cognition is the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses. Good examples of cognition are learning and our ability to reason through logic. Cognitive processes use existing knowledge and generate new knowledge. Cognitive processes are analyzed from different perspectives within different contexts like psychiatry, psychology, education, philosophy, and computer science.
Cognitive Resource Theory of Leadership
The Contingency Model developed by Fiedler was criticized for its lack of flexibility and also over the accuracy of the LPC scale. Fiedler then went on to develop the Cognitive Resource Theory (CRT) which takes into account the personality of the leader, degree of situational stress, and group-leader relations.
The assumption behind this theory is that stress impacts the ability to make decisions. It is the enemy of rationality and a leader cannot think in a logical and analytical manner if she/he is under a high level of stress. According to this proposition, the importance of a leader’s intelligence and experience to effectiveness differs under low and high-stress situations.
Fiedler and Gracia state that a leader’s intellectual ability correlates positively with performance under low stress but negatively under high stress. And conversely, a leader’s experience correlates negatively with performance under low stress but positively under high stress.
Thus, according to Fiedler and Gracia, the level of stress in a situation, determines whether an individual’s intelligence or experience will contribute to leadership performance.
Predictions of Cognitive Resource Theory
The Cognitive Resource theory predicts that the leader's abilities and intelligence can aid organizational success only when leaders adopt a directive leadership style, the situation is stress-free, the group members are supportive and the task requires high intellect. These attributes are discussed below:
1. Directive Approach
When a leader is better in cognitive abilities like intelligence, planning, and decision-making, he must follow a directive approach to improve the overall performance of the team. He needs to communicate to the group what to do, to ensure his plans and decisions are implemented, hence improving the overall performance of the group.
When the group and the people on the group are better than the leader in cognitive abilities, then the leader should choose a non-directive approach. He should seek ideas from the group and identify the best approach/idea and move ahead with the same.
A leader's cognitive ability contributes to the performance of the team only when the leader uses the directive leadership style.
2. Impact of Stress
Stress has a direct co-relation with intelligence and decision quality.
When there is a low stress, then intelligence is fully functional and makes an optimal contribution.
When there is high stress, natural intelligence does not make any difference, but may also have a negative effect.
3. Supportive Group Members
A leader's abilities will contribute to group performance only when group members are supportive of the leader and his goals. In such a situation leader's directions can be easily followed and implemented.
4. Cognitively Demanding Tasks
The intellectual abilities and intelligence of the leader can only be utilized efficiently in difficult, cognitively demanding tasks.
What are the practical applications of Cognitive Resource Theory?
The theory proposes the style of leadership required depending on three variables – the degree of stress, situational control, and task structure.
Leaders should be trained on stress management so that a leader's intellect can be most effectively utilized and also to train leaders to take a directive approach when their knowledge will benefit the group but a less directive approach when group member abilities will contribute to performance.
Based on this theory, for a given situation, depending on the level of the stress, leaders can decide on whether to rely on intelligence or on experience. For low-stress situations, one should rely on intelligence; however, for high-stress situations, one should rely on experience.
In high-stress situations, leaders who are more experienced will produce more quality results. In high-stress situations, rational solutions are generally not available and hence intelligence will not be able to support the decision-making process, whereas previous experience can allow the leader to react.
What are the cognitive resources of the self?
The cognitive resources of a leader refer to their experience, intelligence, competence, and task-relevant knowledge. A leader's knowledge can contribute to performance if it is efficiently communicated, hence requiring a directive leader and also a compliant group that is willing to undertake the commands of the leader.
Related Links
You May Also Like
-
Have you ever resonated that there seem to be as many different ways to lead people as there have been great leaders? When we recall the success of Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, Abraham Lincoln, Napoleon Bonaparte to Steve Jobs and Jack Welch, we also notice that they all used different approaches that were suitable to their specific situations and circumstances. Over the last century, researchers and psychologists have developed simple ways to describe the “Styles of leadership” and in this section, we will explore these commonly known leadership styles.
-
Reciprocal influence theory also known as reciprocal determinism is authored by Albert Bandura and states that an individual's behavior influences and is influenced by both the social world and personal characteristics. Three factors that influence behavior are the environment, the individual, and the behavior itself. Certain leader behaviors can cause subordinate behaviors and reciprocal influence on the leader by the group.
-
Situational Theories of Leadership
The situational theories of leadership assume that the most effective style of leadership depends from situation to situation. Situational leadership is a leadership style in which the leader must adjust to match the development needs of the followers. They must adapt varying behaviors to strike the right balance between task & relationship based on different levels of maturity of followers and also as followers develop and cultivate their skills.
-
The Leader-Member Exchange Theory (LMX), also called the Vertical Dyad Linkage Theory is a relationship-based approach that focuses on the two-way (dyadic) relationship to get the best from all team members. How leaders maintain their position in groups and develop an exchange with each of their subordinates. How leaders and members develop relationships that can contribute to growth or hinder development.
-
Rensis Likert studied the patterns and styles of managers and developed four management systems known as Likert's management systems. These styles developed by him are known as Likert management systems. System 1 - Exploitative Authoritative; System 2 - Benevolent Authoritative; System 3 - Consultative and System 4 - Participative.
-
Servant Leadership is a recent revolutionary theory of leadership that focuses on leaders achieving authority rather than power. A servant leader considers the needs of others and tries to serve the followers by becoming a servant first. Servant leadership is leading with a desire to better serve others.
-
The Hersey and Blanchard Situational Theory model suggests that a leader must adapt his leadership style based on task and relationship behaviors appropriate to the situation. Leadership style is dependent on the maturity level and abilities of followers. Under this model, successful leadership is both task-relevant and relationship-relevant.
-
Burns Transformational Leadership Theory
Transformational leadership theory has been defined by James MacGregor Burns as a process where both leaders and followers mutually raise one another to higher levels of morality and motivation. The concept of transforming leader works with teams to garner trust, respect, and admiration while reaching to higher moral positions. The transformational theory of leadership was developed while studying political leaders and how they use charismatic methods to attract people to the values.
-
Transformational Theories of Leadership
Transformational leadership theories focus on the leadership approach where the leader encourages, inspires employees to innovate and create positive and valuable organizational change. A transformational leader works towards “transforming” the culture to one that cultivates trust, mutual admiration, loyalty, and respect with the end goal of developing followers into leaders. Transformational leaders are known to be visionary, inspiring, daring, risk-takers, and thoughtful.
-
The group and exchange theories of leadership are derived from social psychology. These have their roots in the exchange theory. Leaders from different kinds of relationships with various groups of subordinates. Group theories describe how leaders need to maintain their position in group dynamics.
