Five-Factor Personality Model

Five-Factor Personality Model

Five Factors Model (FFM) also known as Five-Factor Personality Model is based on five broad personality traits which are extraversion, neuroticism, openness to experience, agreeableness, and conscientiousness represented by acronym OCEAN, these traits are often referred to as the “Big Five”.

What are Big Five Personality Traits:

Over the past 25 years, a consensus has emerged among researchers regarding the basic factors that make up what we call personality. Psychologists now believe that of all the various methods for classifying personality dimensions, only one stands out as the most statistically robust: the Big Five. These factors, commonly called the Big Five, are neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness and conscientiousness.

N = Neuroticism = Need for stability, negative emotionality

E = Extraversion = Positive emotionality, sociability

O = Openness = Originality, imagination

A = Agreeableness = Accommodation, adaptability

C = Conscientiousness = Consolidation, will to achieve, goal-oriented

Table below provides the description, attributes and explanations for each of the factors listed above. These five personality factors are the most reliable for differentiating personality traits. The Big Five synonym clusters appear to account for most differences among individual personalities, describing five universal dimensions. We score a high, low or mid-range rating in each dimension and interpretations of the scores is given below:

 

Big Five Personality Traits
(Compiled by www.technofunc.com)

N

Neuroticism

N refers to one’s need for stability or negative emotionality.  The N score estimates the point at which the flight-or-fight response is triggered. 
 

 
Reactive/
High

Very reactive and prefers a stress-free workplace, have a shorter “trigger” and can’t take much stress before feeling it.

Responsive /
Med

Responsive and tend to be calm, secure and steady under normal circumstances. Have a moderate threshold for handling workplace stress.

Resilient/
 Low

Very calm and relatively unaffected by stress that usually burdens others, have a longer fuse and can take abundant amounts of stress before showing the signs.

E

Extraversion

E refers to one’s extraversion. This factor describes comfort levels with external stimuli.

 
Extravert/
High

Likes to be in the thick of the action, prefer to be around other people, is talkative, enthusiastic, sociable and funloving. May not be a good listener as tends to dominate the conversation.

Ambivert /
Med

Move easily from working with others to working alone, have moderate threshold for sensory stimulation and may tire of it after a while.

Introvert/
 Low

Prefers to be away from noise and stimulation, like working alone, is serious, quiet, private person.May be considered as loner by others.

O

Openness

O refers to one’s originality, imagination or openness to new experiences. Reflects level of curiosity versus comfort with familiar territory.

 
Explorer/
High

Appetite for new ideas and activities,gets easily bored, have many broad interests. Curious, introspective and reflective, seeking new experiences and thinking about the future. May be considered impractical or unrealistic by others.

Moderate /
Med

Somewhat down to earth, considers new way of doing something if convinced. Not known for creativity or curiosity, but appreciates innovation and efficiency.

Preserver/
 Low

Prefer familiar territory, more practical, down to earth and comfortable with repetitive activities. May be considered conservative, narrow in thinking by others.

A

Agreeableness

A refers to one’s accommodation ability, negotiation, agreeableness or adaptability. Estimate of point at which person gets tire of being defiant and turn to acts of submission.

 
Adapter/
High

Tends to accommodate the wishes and needs of others, is tolerant, humble and accepting. May be considered as naïve, submissive and conflict-averse by others.

Negotiator /
Med

Can shift between competitive and cooperative situations and usually push for a win-win strategy.

Challenger/
 Low

Tends to cater to his or her own personal priorities, relate to authority by being skeptical, tough, guarded, persistent and competitive. May be considered as hostile, rude, self-centered or combative by others.

C

Conscientiousness

C refers to one’s consolidation, conscientiousness, will to achieve or goal-oriented. Capacity to focus attention on sustained, repetitive, goalfocused behavior.

 
Focused/
High

Tends to consolidate energy, time and resources. Works in disciplined, dependable, linear, sequential manner, with a strong will to achieve goals.

Balanced /
Med

Keep work demands and personal needs in balance. Can switch from focused activities to spontaneous tasks.

 Flexible/
 Low

Prefers multitasking and spontaneous work, approaches goals in a relaxed, spontaneous, open-ended way. Can be considered casual about responsibilities or unorganized by others.

 

Study to Examine Big Five Personality Dimensions:

To assess the links between the Big Five and leadership, Judge, Bono, Ilies, and Gerhardt (2002) conducted a major meta-analysis of 78 leadership and personality studies and found a strong relationship between the Big Five traits and leadership.

This model of leadership was result of a study to examine the relationship between the “Big Five” personality dimensions (neuroticism, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and openness) with respect to career success. A sample of few hundred employees was surveyed in a diverse set of occupations and organizations. Hierarchical regression analysis was used to examine the incremental variance contributed by the five personality traits after controlling for several career-related variables.

Results showed that, extraversion was related positively to salary level, promotions, and career satisfaction and that neuroticism was related negatively to career satisfaction. Agreeableness was related negatively only to career satisfaction and openness was related negatively to salary level. It was confirmed as expected that having certain personality traits is associated with being an effective leader.

Is the Big Five personality assessment valid?

Researchers have pointed to reliability studies that are consistent enough to approach the status of law and for the corporate world; this model provides a reliable, standard vocabulary with which to discuss personality differences. Although the Big Five model gives us a uniform language based on standard definitions, but the fact remains that a combination of forces shape an individual. The Five Factors can be thought as being the main infrastructure as human individuality is too complex for any one system to explain adequately.

This personality assessment can be practically applied to identify the needs of a specific role prior to selecting or appointing a leader and performing a match of factors to determine success of the individual in the role. 

Five-Factor Personality Model

Related Links

You May Also Like

  • Motivation-Hygiene Theory

    Motivation-Hygiene Theory

    The two-factor theory also known as Herzberg's motivation-hygiene theory and dual-factor theory. This motivator-hygiene theory states that certain factors cause job satisfaction whereas certain separate factors cause dissatisfaction in the workplace. An organization can adjust these factors to influence motivation. These factors are respectively termed as motivators and hygiene factors.

  • Hawthorne Studies - Leadership

    Hawthorne Studies - Leadership

    The Hawthorne studies were conducted on workers at the Hawthorne plant of the Western Electric Company by Elton Mayo and Fritz Roethlisberger in the 1920s. This study established the behavioral change that happened due to an awareness of being observed, resulting in active compliance with the supposed wishes of researchers, because of special attention received, or positive response to the stimulus being introduced.

  • Self-Fulfilling Prophecy (SFP) Leader Theory

    Self-Fulfilling Prophecy (SFP) Leader Theory

    Pygmalion theory of Leadership is a model of SFP at work involving supervisory expectancy based on the pygmalion effect. This effect is a type of self-fulfilling prophecy (SFP) in which raising leader's expectations regarding subordinate performance boosts the group's performance. Managers who are led to demand more from their team, lead the team to better performance. There is some evidence that the SFP effect does exists.

  • Leader Member Exchange Theory

    Leader Member Exchange Theory

    The Leader-Member Exchange Theory (LMX), also called the Vertical Dyad Linkage Theory is a relationship-based approach that focuses on the two-way (dyadic) relationship to get the best from all team members. How leaders maintain their position in groups and develop an exchange with each of their subordinates. How leaders and members develop relationships that can contribute to growth or hinder development.

  • Theories of Team Development

    Theories of Team Development

    The development of teams is an ongoing process because the composition of the team may keep on changing. The new members may join and the old members may leave the team. The team members pass through several stages for the development of the team and there has been a lot of research to identify these stages. In this article, we discuss the common theories of team development.

  • Self-Leadership

    Self-Leadership

    Self-leadership is a normative model of self-influence by the use of several behavioral strategies to gain a comprehensive self-influence perspective about oneself. Self-leadership is developing an understanding of your capabilities and abilities to influence your own communication, emotions, and behaviors to lead and influence others. Self-leadership is about personal growth and developing foresight.

  • Functional leadership theory

    Functional leadership theory

    Functional leadership theory addresses specific leader behaviors that are expected to contribute most to the organizational effectiveness by focusing on how the leadership process occurs. The leader should ensure that all needs of the group get addressed.

  • Trait Theory of Leadership

    Trait Theory of Leadership

    Trait Theory of Leadership is based on the assumption that people are born with inherited traits and some traits are particularly suited to leadership. The theory aims to discover specific leadership & personality traits and characteristics proven to predict the likelihood of success or failure of a leader.

  • Life cycle theory of Leadership

    Life cycle theory of Leadership

    Situational Leadership Theory was first introduced in 1969 as the life cycle theory of leadership. This theory suggests that type of leadership style appropriate in a given situation depends on the maturity of the follower. As per life cycle theory, leader need to match the leadership style according to the situation and leader behavior varies as the group matures.

  • Situational Leadership - Application

    Situational Leadership - Application

    Situational Leadership Theories are well known and frequently used for training leaders within organizations. Practical application is how to choose the right leadership approach for the situation. The theory emphasizes leader flexibility and advises leaders to flex their style based on the followers' needs. Leaders must adapt their leadership style to fit the prescribed task, understanding given situation/maturity of followers.

Explore Our Free Training Articles or
Sign Up to Start With Our eLearning Courses

Subscribe to Our Newsletter


© 2023 TechnoFunc, All Rights Reserved