In this study of power, Raven identified five bases of power as coercive, reward, legitimate, referent, and expert. The 5 Types of Power can help you decide when it is appropriate to use a particular type of power in important situations. Leadership involves authority and it is very important for leaders to understand what type of power they're using.
“There should never be any need for a leader to tell other people how powerful and influential he or she is. … Yes, leaders are power brokers. But they are power brokers on behalf of people they lead.”
The use of power is integral to leadership success, but what power actually is? Is power a synonym to influence, coercion, control, and authority? Power is the ability to exercise influence or control over others. Leadership involves authority and it is very important for leaders to understand what type of power they're using.
Noted social psychologists John R. P. French and Bertram Raven conducted a study in 1959 and concluded that power can be divided into five different forms. The 5 Types of Power in Leadership are Coercive power, expert power, legitimate power, referent power, and reward power. Later on, they added one more power called informational power to the list.
Authority is the right to command and extract obedience from others. It comes from the organization and it allows the leader to use power.
In the functioning of a leader, the ability to guide the action of others is achieved through his or her authority. Carrying out of these decisions is accomplished because of the power of the leader.
Leaders combine five sources of power inappropriate ways to achieve both short- and long-term goals. You will see the relationship between the authority and power of a leader as we go further to understand various types of power.
This power comes to the leader when the organization’s authority is accepted. It comes from the rules of the organization. For e.g. parents, teachers, managers, police, etc. have legitimate power only when their authority is accepted in the positions they hold.
This source of power stems from one’s expertise, skill, and knowledge. This is the power of knowledge and skill of special kinds that is important in getting the job done. A person’s professional competence or knowledge gives him or her expert power. Leaders of professional workgroups—engineering, finance, techno-functional, domain knowledge experts, human resources, and so on rely heavily on this type of power for their success. The credibility increases with expertise and one can lead other persons to trust the judgments and decisions taken by the leader. A leader may not be an expert in all fields, but one can certainly take the help of experts in particular fields as and when required.
This is the power of attraction or devotion, the desire of one person to admire another. A leader high in this source of power is liked or admired by others based on personal traits. A subordinate feels a positive attraction towards a leader by identifying oneself, with the leader, or gets influenced by the leader’s attractive power. This power is based on a belief in, admiration for, or identification with the leader. This power helps the subordinate to understand and value the leader so much that one understands and acts according to the expectations of the boss or the leader. It helps one to act as one’s own boss, and behave in ways one thinks the boss will want.
This power is the present or potential ability to reward for worthy behavior. This power is based on the leader’s ability to provide rewards, real or intrinsic. The superior or the leader has the power to give tangible rewards such as promotion, office space, time off from work, attractive work assignments, and help to the subordinate. Also, psychological rewards like praise, appreciation, approval, and recognition can be given by the leader or the superior to the subordinate. The subordinate has to believe that the leader has access to higher authorities; therefore, the leader can give rewards. This reward power of the leader can also increase the leader’s charismatic and legitimate power. In organizations, rewards are often positive incentives such as pay, promotion, or recognition.
This is the ability to threaten or punish. This power is based on fear of the leader. The leader has the authority to control potential punishments like undesirable work assignments, reprimands, or dismissal. There will always be circumstances in an organization when a leader needs to exercise some form of coercive power in difficult situations. The leader can give tangible punishment like dismissal, demotion, low rating, less satisfying work assignments, etc. He may also give psychological punishments like criticism, avoidance, disapproval or satirical remarks, etc. on the subordinate. The reward power helps to avoid something undesirable. The self-esteem of the subordinate will increase because of reward power. It also decreases because of punishment or coercive power.
The overuse of this type of power will damage a leader’s ability to get results, especially if the leader is relying on others to use judgment and discretion on the job. Even a subordinate may withdraw or break the rules or become hostile. One may not feel attracted to the charismatic power of the leader and at times may ignore the leader’s legitimate power. Having seen the reasons for differences between the authority and power of the leader, you should know the type of leaders as understood on the basis of their authority and power.
Understanding the power dynamics a leader can choose to act like a boss or function like a partner. In some situations, he can even play the role of the coach. Besides the power aspect one should also account for the following:
A formal leader is selected by the organization. A formal source of power is based on the authority of one’s position within the organization. For example, a manager is a formal leader by virtue of the authority coming from the organization. Managers use this power to expect their subordinates who are working under their authority within the organization, to act upon their commands, requests or demands. He or she influences others to help accomplish the goals of the organization or unit. Such leadership lasts over a long period of time because the traditional organizational charts and job descriptions formalize this type of power.
An informal leader is chosen by the group. Thus, all managers are leaders if their authority is accepted, but not all leaders are managers. Informal leadership is leadership without position and may shift from one person to another. It may last for a brief time. Most people are leaders at one time or the other and they can have an influence on others as defined by the concept of leadership itself.
The ideal leader is the one who can combine formal and informal leadership simultaneously within himself or herself.
Reward power is the most commonly used power in modern organizations. Reward Power is the ability or capability of the manager to decide the reward, increment, or other benefits to the employee to keep him motivated. All organizations establish some kind of process to ensure managers are able to influence the benefits that will be given to the employees based on their performance. The anticipation of this reward from the manager can encourage employees to put their best to achieve organizational objectives. Rewards may also be of non-financial in nature like a pat on the back, recognition in front of the team, nomination to some training, increased exposure to leadership, opportunities for development, and increased job responsibility. Reward power works because it enables managers to provide something that the employees want for the fulfillment of their needs or wishes.
One of the most important tasks of the manager is to get work done to meet organizational goals by motivating employees. Reward power gives leaders the power to exert influence on subordinates by having the power to reward excellence or good work. Leaders must be able to influence their followers to achieve greater performance and drive important decisions across organization bureaucracy. Leaders use various types of powers to influence up, down, and across the organization, impacting business results by driving behavior change.
Coercive power is the ability to threaten or punish. The leader ensures compliance by giving punishment like dismissal, demotion, low rating, less satisfying work assignments etc. The self-esteem of the subordinate will decreases because of punishment or coercive power. The subordinate may withdraw or break the rules or become hostile. Coercive power should be exercised very carefully and in a discreet manner because abuse or overuse of coercive power may lead to resistance by the followers. The overuse of this type of power will damage a leader’s ability to get results, especially if the leader is relying on others to use judgment and discretion on the job.
In the workplace, one can experience primarily three types of power in operation; Role power, Expertise power, and Relationship power. Role power comes from the position one holds and the authority attached to it. Expert power is associated with the dependency one creates due to expertise and the relationship power is developed over a course of time by influencing others.
The 5 Types of Power one can observe in organizational behavior are coercive power, expert power, legitimate power, referent power, and reward power. Bases of power are the authority that comes from an organization and it allows the leader to use power. This organizational authority gives the right to the leader to command and extract obedience from others.
The three powers viz. legitimate, reward, and coercive power falls within the formal category by virtue of the authority coming from the organization. Whereas charismatic power and expert power fall under the informal power of leadership which is cultivated by the leader and exists without position and may shift from one person to another or even may last only for a brief time.
Management theories are the recommended management strategies that enable us to better understand and approach management. Many management frameworks and guidelines were developed during the last four decades.
Continuum of leadership is a leadership theory based on the relationship between the level of freedom given to the team and the level of authority used by the manager. The chosen leadership style will depend on multiple factors, including the leader's personality.
Have you ever resonated that there seem to be as many different ways to lead people as there have been great leaders? When we recall the success of Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, Abraham Lincoln, Napoleon Bonaparte to Steve Jobs and Jack Welch, we also notice that they all used different approaches that were suitable to their specific situations and circumstances. Over the last century, researchers and psychologists have developed simple ways to describe the “Styles of leadership” and in this section, we will explore these commonly known leadership styles.
Leadership traits refer to personal qualities that define effective leaders. Here are the major leadership qualities that can make someone a good leader. Five key traits that are common in leaders can be learned and sharpened with time.
Situational Theories of Leadership
The situational theories of leadership assume that the most effective style of leadership depends from situation to situation. Situational leadership is a leadership style in which the leader must adjust to match the development needs of the followers. They must adapt varying behaviors to strike the right balance between task & relationship based on different levels of maturity of followers and also as followers develop and cultivate their skills.
Generating Ideas using Brainstorming
The brainstorming technique was developed by Alex F. Osborn in 1957 and brainstorming means where a team of members generates a large amount of alternative fruitful ideas on a specific problem without any criticism and then evaluates each idea in terms of their pros and cons. Brainstorming techniques fall into four broad categories: visioning, exploring, modifying, and experimenting.
The Systemic Approach to Leadership
The systemic approach to leadership looks at the organization as a whole and focuses on the understanding of the organization as a system. Moving to systems thinking demand managers to view organizations as organic systems. Leaders are also part of this complex system which is constantly undergoing change and evolving. The leaders need to manage the relations and networks within these systems by acting with systemic awareness.
The two-factor theory also known as Herzberg's motivation-hygiene theory and dual-factor theory. This motivator-hygiene theory states that certain factors cause job satisfaction whereas certain separate factors cause dissatisfaction in the workplace. An organization can adjust these factors to influence motivation. These factors are respectively termed as motivators and hygiene factors.
Functional leadership theory addresses specific leader behaviors that are expected to contribute most to the organizational effectiveness by focusing on how the leadership process occurs. The leader should ensure that all needs of the group get addressed.
Team leadership theory is a recent leadership theory that does not discriminate between the leader and the other team members. The approach considers contributions from each team member to be critical for organizational success. This approach focused on the overall team effectiveness and team problems are diagnosed and action is taken to remediate weakness. This approach provides for taking corrective action when the leader deems necessary.
© 2023 TechnoFunc, All Rights Reserved