Early studies on leadership were done at Ohio State University using the Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire to identify the leader's observable behaviors. Ohio State study on leadership found two behavioral characteristics of leadership - people-oriented (consideration) and task-oriented (initiating structure) leadership style.
As leadership studies that were aimed at identifying the appropriate traits didn't yield any conclusive results,, Stogdill (1957) at the Bureau of Business Research at Ohio State University initiated ‘a series of researches on leadership in 1945. He, along with his colleagues, studied leader behavior in numerous types of groups and situations by using a “Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire (LBDQ)”.
The Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire (LBDQ) was developed by the staff of the Personnel Research Board, The Ohio State University, as one project of the Ohio State Leadership Studies, directed by Dr. Carroll L. Shartle. LBDQ constituted of a list of 150 statements from their generated responses that included 1,800 statements. The resulting questionnaire is now well-known as the “LBDQ” or the “Leaders Behavior Description Questionnaire”. The LBDQ is published by the Bureau of Business Research, College of Commerce and Administration, The Ohio State University; Columbus, OH. The version presented below was copyrighted in 1957 and may still be ordered if you wish to use it.
The LBDQ’s list of questions was designed to measure nine different behavioral leadership dimensions. The LBDQ provides a technique whereby group members may describe the behavior of the leader, or leaders, in any type of group or organization, provided the followers have had an opportunity to observe the leader in action as a leader of their group. LBDQ questions given below are only for research and knowledge purposes.
SN |
Leader Behavior Description |
Factors |
1 |
S/he does personal favors for group members. |
Consideration |
2 |
S/he makes her/his attitudes clear to the group. A B C D E |
Initiating Structure |
3 |
S/he does little things to make it pleasant to be a member of the group. |
Consideration |
4 |
S/he tries out his new ideas with the group. |
Initiating Structure |
5 |
S/he acts as the real leader of the group. |
Not Used |
6 |
S/he is easy to understand. |
Consideration |
7 |
S/he rules with an iron hand. |
Initiating Structure |
8 |
S/he finds time to listen to group members. |
Consideration |
9 |
S/he criticizes poor work. |
Initiating Structure |
10 |
S/he gives advance notice of changes. |
Not Used |
11 |
S/he speaks in a manner not to be questioned. |
Initiating Structure |
12 |
S/he keeps to her/himself. |
Consideration |
13 |
S/he looks out for the personal welfare of individual group members. |
Consideration |
14 |
S/h assigns group members to particular tasks. |
Initiating Structure |
15 |
S/he is the spokesman of the group. |
Not Used |
16 |
S/he schedules the work to be done. |
Initiating Structure |
17 |
S/he maintains definite standards of performance. |
Initiating Structure |
18 |
S/he refuses to explain her/his actions. |
Consideration |
19 |
S/he keeps the group informed. |
Not Used |
20 |
S/he acts without consulting the group. |
Consideration |
21 |
S/he backs up the members in their actions. |
Consideration |
22 |
S/he emphasizes the meeting of deadlines. |
Initiating Structure |
23 |
S/he treats all group members as her/his equals. |
Consideration |
24 |
S/he encourages the use of uniform procedures. |
Initiating Structure |
25 |
S/he gets what s/he asks for from her/his superiors. |
Not Used |
26 |
S/he is willing to make changes. |
Consideration |
27 |
S/he makes sure that her/his part in the organization is understood by group members. |
Initiating Structure |
28 |
S/he is friendly and approachable. |
Consideration |
29 |
S/he asks that group members follow standard rules and regulations. |
Initiating Structure |
30 |
S/he fails to take necessary action. |
Not Used |
31 |
S/he makes group members feel at ease when talking with them. |
Consideration |
32 |
S/he lets group members know what is expected of them. |
Initiating Structure |
33 |
S/he speaks as the representative of the group. |
Not Used |
34 |
S/he puts suggestions made by the group into action. |
Consideration |
35 |
S/he sees to it that group members are working up to capacity. |
Initiating Structure |
36 |
S/he lets other people take away her/his leadership in the group. |
Not Used |
37 |
S/he gets her/his superiors to act for the welfare of the group. |
Not Used |
38 |
S/he gets group approval in important matters before going ahead. |
Consideration |
39 |
S/he sees to it that the work of the group members is coordinated. |
Initiating Structure |
40 |
S/he keeps the group working together as a team. |
Not Used |
The studies were conducted on Air Force Commanders and members of bomber crews, officers, non-commissioned personnel, civilian administrators in the Navy Department, manufacturing supervisors, executives, teachers, principals and school superintendents and leaders of various civilian groups. As part of the study, the LBDQ was administered to these various groups of individuals which ranged from college students and their administrators, private companies including military personnel. One of the primary purposes of the study was to identify common leadership behaviors. The LBDQ was administered in a wide variety of situations.
They did not have any satisfactory definition of leadership. They also did not think leadership is synonymous with `good' leadership. After compiling and analyzing the results, the study led to the conclusion that there were two groups of behaviors that were strongly correlated. The Ohio State studies examined leaders’ task versus people orientation. Two dimensions of; leadership continually emerging from the study were `consideration' and the other was ‘initiating structure’. These were defined as Consideration (People Oriented behavioral Leaders) and Initiating Structure (Task Oriented Leaders).
Consideration reflects the extent to which individuals are likely to have job, relationship characterized by mutual respect for subordinates, ideas and consideration of subordinates, feelings. You may like to describe it as the behavior of the leader indicating friendship, mutual trust, respect and warmth in the relationship between the leader and his group members. The people oriented leaders are focusing their behaviors on ensuring that the inner needs of the people are satisfied. Thus they will seek to motivate their staff through emphasizing the human relation. People oriented leaders still focus on the task and the results; they just achieve them through different means.
Examples of observed behavior of the leader under consideration are as follows:
Consideration:
Initiating Structure – Task Oriented:
Initiating structure reflects the extent to which individuals are likely to define and structure their roles and those of their subordinates towards goal attainment. In other words, it is the behavior of the leader which deals with the relationship between him and the work-group and tries to establish well-defined patterns of organization, channels of communication and method of procedure. The task concerned leaders are focusing their behaviors on the organizational structure, the operating procedures (S.O.P.) and they like to keep control. Task-oriented leaders are still concerned with their staff motivation; however it's not their main concern.
Examples of observed behavior of the leader under initiating structure are as follows:
Initiating Structure:
In the above example of items check how frequently as a leader you engage yourself by marking A(Always), O(Occasionally) or N(Never), against each one of the items in the list of statements given above. This may help you to know your own style of leadership. One can do this exercise by observing and judging the behavior of the leader in a work situation.
Conceptually, the Ohio State studies helped to shift the focus of the field from a universal trait approach to a more situational, behavioral-based view. The Ohio State studies contributed a model of programmatic construct, validation and investigation, and provided future researchers with useful research instruments. These studies, attempted to find what behaviors substantially accounted for most of the leadership behavior described by employees. Beginning with over a thousand dimensions, researchers narrowed the list to two explained above. Both factors were found to be associated with effective leadership. Followers of leaders who are high in consideration were more satisfied with their jobs; more motivated, and had more respect for their leader. Leaders who were high in initiating structure typically had higher levels of group and organization productivity along with more positive performance evaluations. The findings of the LBDQ indicate that a successful leader will possess a strong ability to be considerate of others, as well as an ability to initiate structure. In the workplace this might be a manager who is very personable and understanding, but is also able to set expectations and guidelines that require workers to be motivated, efficient, and able to produce high-quality work.
Leadership traits refer to personal qualities that define effective leaders. Here are the major leadership qualities that can make someone a good leader. Five key traits that are common in leaders can be learned and sharpened with time.
The Hersey and Blanchard Situational Theory model suggests that a leader must adapt his leadership style based on task and relationship behaviors appropriate to the situation. Leadership style is dependent on the maturity level and abilities of followers. Under this model, successful leadership is both task-relevant and relationship-relevant.
The development of teams is an ongoing process because the composition of the team may keep on changing. The new members may join and the old members may leave the team. The team members pass through several stages for the development of the team and there has been a lot of research to identify these stages. In this article, we discuss the common theories of team development.
Idiosyncrasy Credit Model of Leadership builds upon the awareness that when the emergent leader meets the team's expectations, idiosyncrasy credits are awarded. These credits depend on how the leader fulfilled follower's expectations and what is the impact of the leader's decisions on the follower. When the balance of credits shifts, another leader will emerge.
Charismatic leadership is a trait-based leadership theory where the leaders act as visionary driven by their convictions and motivate their followers to work towards common vision using their charm and persuasiveness. These charismatic leaders act as role models and exhibit extraordinary characteristics that inspire devotion and motivation in followers to persuade change. Leaders are able to cultivate a profound sense of trust with the group of followers.
The Path-Goal theory defines the characteristics of followers and organizational context and the corresponding leadership style best suited to these factors. A leader should adapt to a behavior that is most relevant for a given employee and work environment mix to achieve a goal. The application of theory drives increased employees' motivation, empowerment, and satisfaction resulting in increased productivity.
Transactional Analysis also is known as the theory of human personality was proposed by Eric Berne in the 1950s. This theory of transactional leadership defines three different ego states in a person who engages in transactions with another person's ego states. These three ego states refer to major parts of an individual's personality and reflect an entire system of thought, feeling, and behavior.
Rensis Likert studied the patterns and styles of managers and developed four management systems known as Likert's management systems. These styles developed by him are known as Likert management systems. System 1 - Exploitative Authoritative; System 2 - Benevolent Authoritative; System 3 - Consultative and System 4 - Participative.
Trait theories of leadership explain the leadership traits that have been studied to determine what makes certain people great leaders. The practical application of the theory is looking at how the leader‟s behavior affects their subjects.
Contingency Theories of Leadership
Contingency theories of leadership focus on both the leader's persona as well as the situation/environment in which that leader operates. These theories consider the context of leadership which means whether or not the leadership style suits a particular situation and states that a leader can be effective in one circumstance and a failure in another one. A leader will be most effective when he applies the right leadership style to a given situation and environment around him. Contingent leaders are flexible and adaptable.
© 2023 TechnoFunc, All Rights Reserved